4.4 · Sample process
Use a $2M seed round financing case to completely walk through the minimum closed loop of WCN.
The abstract process needs a real scenario to verify. Here we use a composite case of $2M seed round financing + legal collaboration to walk through all the mechanisms of WCN - node collaboration, agent execution, proof collection and PoB attribution - and compare how long the same thing would take without WCN.
Scene setting
Project Party: An AI + DeFi infrastructure project (team in Singapore, technology in Europe), currently raising $2M in seed round financing. need:
Find the right capitalPreference: Funds that understand the intersection of AI + DeFi, can accept SAFE + Token Warrant structure, face value $200K-$500K.
Complete legal structureRequired: SAFE agreement review, Token Warrant terms, Singapore entity compliance inspection, investor KYC process.
Parties in the WCN Network:
Capital node AHong Kong fund, prefers AI + Infra track, seed round face value $300K-$500K.
Capital Node BDubai family office, prefers DeFi infrastructure, ticket price $500K-$1M.
Service node CSingapore legal team specializes in SAFE/SAFT + Token Warrant structures.
Research AgentResponsible for project data structuring, competitive product analysis, risk marking, and investment memorandum draft.
Execution AgentResponsible for meeting minutes, to-do tracking, reminders, and material collection status.
14 days complete process
Day 1-2: Resource entry and matching
Day 1: Project entryProject nodes submit information to Project Intake: Deck, Tokenomics draft, team background, technical documents, financing terms ($2M SAFE + Token Warrant). Research Agent generates structured summary + risk list + competitive comparison in 2 hours.
Day 2: Matching and Deal Room CreationDeal Agent matches A and B based on capital node preferences. The system creates a Deal Room, the Deal Owner (played by the recommended regional node) is designated, and service node C is added to the legal track. All parties see the same structured information.
Day 3-7: Execution Advancement
Day 3: First meetingDeal Owner organizes a video conference between the project party and capital node A. Execution Agent generates minutes in real time, automatically extracts 5 Action Items and assigns owners. Within 30 minutes of the meeting, all participants receive structured minutes.
Day 4-5: Due diligence and legal affairs in parallelCapital Node A requires supplementary technical audit reports and founder background checks. Research Agent sorted it out in 2 hours. At the same time, service node C begins to review the SAFE + Token Warrant terms and issues a preliminary legal opinion on Day 5.
Day 6: Second round of meeting + capital node B entryCapital Node A confirms follow-up intention ($400K). Capital Node B requested a separate meeting after reading the information. Deal Room manages two capital lines at the same time, and the status is tracked separately.
Day 7: Negotiating TermsThe project party and Capital Node A reach an agreement on the valuation and Token Warrant ratio. Service Node C issues the final legal opinion. Execution Agent tracks the status of all files to be signed.
Day 8-11: Agreement signing and payment
Day 8-9: Agreement signingCapital Node A signs SAFE ($400K) + Token Warrant. Capital Node B signs SAFE ($500K) + Token Warrant. Service Node C completes the compliance review of all protocols.
Day 10-11: Payment confirmationCapital node A completed the payment of $400K (bank wire). Capital Node B completed the transfer of $500K ($300K Wire + $200K USDC). Execution Agent tracks the payment status and automatically associates bank confirmations with on-chain records.
Day 12-14: Evidence collection and PoB
Day 12: Evidence packingDeal Owner submits the following evidence to the Proof Desk: signed SAFE agreement (2 copies), Token Warrant (2 copies), payment bank confirmation (2 copies), on-chain USDC transfer hash (1 copy), legal opinion (1 copy), and all meeting minutes (4 copies).
Day 13: ReviewIndependent reviewers check the evidence for completeness and authenticity. Confirmation: The financing amount is $900K (the first level of this round), the terms of the agreement are consistent with the entry, the legal delivery is complete, and the timeline is reasonable.
Day 14: PoB generation + attributionAfter the review is passed, the system generates a PoB Event. Attribution is allocated as follows (see below).
Attribution Allocation Details
Deal Owner (region node)Attribution: 30%. Reason: Recommend project parties, create Deal Room, organize all meetings, and promote signing progress.
Capital node AAttribution: 20%. Reason: Complete due diligence, contract signing, and payment of $400K.
Capital Node BAttribution: 20%. Reason: Complete due diligence, sign contract, and pay $500K.
Service node CAttribution: 18%. Reasons: Legal opinion, agreement review, compliance confirmation.
Agent contributionAttribution: 12%. Reason: Research Agent's project summary is adopted by the capital node as a basis for decision-making (proven by logs), and Execution Agent's minutes and reminders promote process efficiency.
The attribution ratio is not a fixed template, but is dynamically calculated based on the evidence chain. If a Research Agent's report is not adopted, Agent attribution is 0% - only the output that is adopted and enters the closed loop is valuable.
Comparison: How to do the same thing without WCN
No WCNThe project party sent a Deck to 20 people in Token2049 → 5 of them responded → 3 arranged meetings (2-3 weeks for coordination) → Waiting for feedback after the meeting (1-2 weeks) → Terms negotiation through email and Telegram (1-2 weeks) → Legal affairs found law firms (1-2 weeks) → Contract signing and payment (1 week) → There is no system to record who recommended whom and who promoted what. **Typical cycle: 6-10 weeks. ** And all process information is scattered in Telegram, Email and Google Docs, making it impossible to trace and settle.
Use WCNProject entry is structured → Agent completes preliminary screening and matching in 2 hours → Deal Room allows all participants to synchronize information → Legal affairs and financing are promoted in parallel → Execution Agent eliminates reminders and information synchronization time → Automatic collection of evidence → Automatic calculation of attribution. **Typical cycle time: 14 days. ** All process evidence is kept intact, attribution is clear, and settlement can be entered directly.
Source of efficiency improvement: It is not that WCN allows investors to make decisions faster (the time required for investment judgment will not change), but it eliminates coordination friction - information synchronization, reminder follow-up, material sorting, and legal coordination. These "coordination taxes" account for 30-40% of the time in the traditional process. WCN compresses this part to nearly zero through structured workflow and Agent assistance.
In this case, what did the system get?
project partyCompleted $900K first pass + legal structure in 14 days, the efficiency is 3-4 times that of the traditional path. All collaboration records are complete and can be used for subsequent rounds of trust transfer.
Capital sideStructured data reduces due diligence costs by 50%+. Investment records enter the system, accumulating investor credibility and matching accuracy.
Service providerLegal deliverables are formally documented and attributed. It is no longer "helping to take a look", but a formal contribution with a clear basis for settlement.
networkA complete PoB closed loop enters the system. The reputation scores of the participants are updated, and the Agent's matching model obtains new training data. In the future, the efficiency of similar Deals will be further improved.
This is the essential difference between WCN and introduction groups, CRM or point tools: it allows a collaboration not only to produce results, but also to become a system asset - each closed loop makes the network stronger.