What they bring
Protocol architecture, operating metrics, technical dependencies, ecosystem goals, and accountable maintainers.
PARTICIPANT 02 / 24
Protocol teams
Protocol teams enter through the Project path while technical claims, governance design, and ecosystem dependencies remain separately reviewable.
ProjectStandard review
Typical participants
L1/L2 teams, DApps, DeFi protocols, DePIN networks, stablecoin projects, payment protocols, and data networks.
L1/L2 · DApp · DeFi · data network
WCN role map
- Participant type
- protocol_team
- Primary role
- Project
- Supporting roles
- Track · Service
- Review path
- Standard review
- Phase 1 path
- Eligible to apply for review.
PARTICIPATION FIT
What this participant brings—and what they may seek.
What they may seek
Technical review, ecosystem partners, specialist services, market context, and evidence-backed milestone execution.
AI + HUMAN CONTROL
AI may prepare. People retain decision authority.
Project Intake Copilot
The workbench describes a bounded assistance pattern for intake, structure, checks, and drafts. It is not proof that a public AI product or integration is live.
Mandatory Human Gate
Technical claims, token or governance commitments, and compliance judgments.
PUBLIC BOUNDARY
Participation is reviewed, not automatic.
WCN does not validate a protocol merely because documentation or local tests exist.
- Eligible to apply for review.
- Technical claims, token or governance commitments, and compliance judgments.
- These tags name evidence categories for future reviewed work. They do not create public Proof, acceptance, settlement, certification, or endorsement.
Evidence vocabulary: technical_proof · deal_proof
Project